home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
050492
/
05049929.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
5KB
|
103 lines
<text id=92TT0995>
<title>
May 04, 1992: Reviews:Cinema
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
May 04, 1992 Why Roe v. Wade Is Already Moot
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
REVIEWS, Page 77
CINEMA
Death on the Reservation
</hdr><body>
<p>By RICHARD SCHICKEL
</p>
<p> TITLE: Incident at Oglala
DIRECTOR: Michael Apted
TITLE: Thunderheart
DIRECTOR: Michael Apted
WRITER: John Fusco
</p>
<p> THE BOTTOM LINE: Nonfictional and fictional quests for the
same truth -- a thinking person's double feature.
</p>
<p> In Incident at Oglala, which is a documentary, two FBI
agents lose their life as they pursue a suspect on South
Dakota's Pine Ridge Sioux Indian reservation. In Thunderheart,
which is fictional, an FBI agent regains his soul as he
investigates a murder in the same place.
</p>
<p> Both movies also share a director, Michael Apted, who is
probably the first filmmaker ever to bring out such closely
related works at roughly the same moment. Certainly no one
before has so vividly availed himself of the chance to shed the
crosslight of fiction (Thunderheart was made after Incident) on
his own attempt to write history on film. Flaws and all, the
movies constitute a directorial tour de force, as well as an
intriguing study in cultural anthropology and a plea to social
conscience that is difficult to ignore.
</p>
<p> The documentary owes something to Errol Morris' The Thin
Blue Line. Like that brilliantly styled film, it returns
repeatedly to the crime scene, reconstructing different versions
of the murder. But for the most part, it is content to let a
wide range of heads do a lot of talking about the brutal death
of special agents Jack Coler and Ron Williams on June 26, 1975.
At that time, the radical American Indian Movement was seeking
to re-establish traditional tribal ways and to disestablish a
tribal leadership it considered corrupt. Its opponents responded
with terror squads, and between them the two sides created
something close to a civil war on the reservation.
</p>
<p> Chasing a man they suspected had stolen a pair of boots,
the G-men stumbled into an AIM camp and, perhaps
understandably, a fire fight broke out, at the end of which the
agents were dead. Three AIM members were charged with their
murder. Two were acquitted, but Leonard Peltier, who was tried
separately, was convicted on the basis of evidence the film
insists -- quite convincingly -- was trumped up. He continues
to serve double life sentences.
</p>
<p> Thunderheart, with no obligation to sift through the
intricate facts of a complicated case, has more time than the
documentary to portray the shameful living conditions at Pine
Ridge and to suggest the power of the mystical traditions AIM
sought to revive. Its protagonist, an FBI agent named Ray Levoi
(Val Kilmer), is assigned to the reservation mainly for public
relations reasons; he's one-quarter Sioux. And not proud of it.
But the squalor of Pine Ridge touches him, as do the Native
Americans, led by a tough, funny tribal policeman (Graham
Greene) and a sly, funny shaman (Chief Ted Thin Elk). Slowly,
but with powerfully accumulating dramatic effect, they put Levoi
in touch with his Indian heritage. And with the truth about the
murder he is there to investigate. It turns out to be similar
to the situation projected in the documentary: there is an
attempt to frame AIM members, with Levoi's FBI boss (Sam
Shepard) both faking and ignoring evidence in order to get a
quick conviction.
</p>
<p> Gripping as both films are, they have one more thing in
common: problematic conclusions. Thunderheart ends with a
conventionally melodramatic confron tation, which, though
impressively staged, is unpersuasively upbeat, given the
brutality and helplessness of life on the reservation that the
movie has so indelibly impressed upon us. Incident at Oglala is,
by contrast, evasive about a significant point. One comes away
from it convinced that the men accused of this crime (including
Leonard Peltier) were victimized by the FBI and prosecutors in
need of hasty revenge for the death of two of their own.
Nevertheless, the fact remains that the agents were executed by
shots fired at close range after they were wounded and
defenseless. One cannot completely sympathize with a movement
that does not either own up to the crime or prove lack of
complicity in it. Nor can one entirely accept a movie that does
not ask more forthright questions about it.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>