home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT0995>
- <title>
- May 04, 1992: Reviews:Cinema
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- May 04, 1992 Why Roe v. Wade Is Already Moot
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEWS, Page 77
- CINEMA
- Death on the Reservation
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By RICHARD SCHICKEL
- </p>
- <p> TITLE: Incident at Oglala
- DIRECTOR: Michael Apted
- TITLE: Thunderheart
- DIRECTOR: Michael Apted
- WRITER: John Fusco
- </p>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: Nonfictional and fictional quests for the
- same truth -- a thinking person's double feature.
- </p>
- <p> In Incident at Oglala, which is a documentary, two FBI
- agents lose their life as they pursue a suspect on South
- Dakota's Pine Ridge Sioux Indian reservation. In Thunderheart,
- which is fictional, an FBI agent regains his soul as he
- investigates a murder in the same place.
- </p>
- <p> Both movies also share a director, Michael Apted, who is
- probably the first filmmaker ever to bring out such closely
- related works at roughly the same moment. Certainly no one
- before has so vividly availed himself of the chance to shed the
- crosslight of fiction (Thunderheart was made after Incident) on
- his own attempt to write history on film. Flaws and all, the
- movies constitute a directorial tour de force, as well as an
- intriguing study in cultural anthropology and a plea to social
- conscience that is difficult to ignore.
- </p>
- <p> The documentary owes something to Errol Morris' The Thin
- Blue Line. Like that brilliantly styled film, it returns
- repeatedly to the crime scene, reconstructing different versions
- of the murder. But for the most part, it is content to let a
- wide range of heads do a lot of talking about the brutal death
- of special agents Jack Coler and Ron Williams on June 26, 1975.
- At that time, the radical American Indian Movement was seeking
- to re-establish traditional tribal ways and to disestablish a
- tribal leadership it considered corrupt. Its opponents responded
- with terror squads, and between them the two sides created
- something close to a civil war on the reservation.
- </p>
- <p> Chasing a man they suspected had stolen a pair of boots,
- the G-men stumbled into an AIM camp and, perhaps
- understandably, a fire fight broke out, at the end of which the
- agents were dead. Three AIM members were charged with their
- murder. Two were acquitted, but Leonard Peltier, who was tried
- separately, was convicted on the basis of evidence the film
- insists -- quite convincingly -- was trumped up. He continues
- to serve double life sentences.
- </p>
- <p> Thunderheart, with no obligation to sift through the
- intricate facts of a complicated case, has more time than the
- documentary to portray the shameful living conditions at Pine
- Ridge and to suggest the power of the mystical traditions AIM
- sought to revive. Its protagonist, an FBI agent named Ray Levoi
- (Val Kilmer), is assigned to the reservation mainly for public
- relations reasons; he's one-quarter Sioux. And not proud of it.
- But the squalor of Pine Ridge touches him, as do the Native
- Americans, led by a tough, funny tribal policeman (Graham
- Greene) and a sly, funny shaman (Chief Ted Thin Elk). Slowly,
- but with powerfully accumulating dramatic effect, they put Levoi
- in touch with his Indian heritage. And with the truth about the
- murder he is there to investigate. It turns out to be similar
- to the situation projected in the documentary: there is an
- attempt to frame AIM members, with Levoi's FBI boss (Sam
- Shepard) both faking and ignoring evidence in order to get a
- quick conviction.
- </p>
- <p> Gripping as both films are, they have one more thing in
- common: problematic conclusions. Thunderheart ends with a
- conventionally melodramatic confron tation, which, though
- impressively staged, is unpersuasively upbeat, given the
- brutality and helplessness of life on the reservation that the
- movie has so indelibly impressed upon us. Incident at Oglala is,
- by contrast, evasive about a significant point. One comes away
- from it convinced that the men accused of this crime (including
- Leonard Peltier) were victimized by the FBI and prosecutors in
- need of hasty revenge for the death of two of their own.
- Nevertheless, the fact remains that the agents were executed by
- shots fired at close range after they were wounded and
- defenseless. One cannot completely sympathize with a movement
- that does not either own up to the crime or prove lack of
- complicity in it. Nor can one entirely accept a movie that does
- not ask more forthright questions about it.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-